Lusaka played host to the largest climate adaptation gathering in the UN system this week, as over 450 delegates descended on Zambia for the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Expo 2025. Environment Minister Mike Mposha struck a defiant tone, calling on the Global North to triple climate finance to $300 billion annually by 2035, reflecting mounting frustration with adaptation's financial realities.

The Expo's focus on technical innovations tell a hopeful story. Updated NAP guidelines now incorporate AI tools, gender-responsive approaches, and nature-based solutions. African leaders positioned indigenous knowledge as "Africa's climate compass," signaling a conceptual shift toward locally-rooted solutions rather than externally imposed frameworks.

Yet Zambia's location was symbolically apt: its copper-dependent economy exemplifies the climate-development nexus that adaptation must navigate, simultaneously vulnerable to climate shocks and dependent on extractive industries driving them.

New research into Germany’s federal adaptation scheme (DAS) finds just one in four cities and districts has secured funding, and the winners skew urban, affluent, and green‑leaning. Urban cores are 3.8 times more likely to receive grants than rural areas, and 2.5 times more likely in semi-urban districts. Wealth, higher education, younger demographics, and progressive councils strongly predict success obtaining funding. Vulnerability indicators, like agricultural land share, forest cover, or elderly populations barely feature.

Most funding clusters in North‑Rhine‑Westphalia (Cologne, Dortmund), Hesse (Frankfurt), and Rhineland‑Palatinate (Mainz), reflecting institutional capacity, not hazard exposure. Prior mitigation funding correlates with adaptation funding success, but the link disappears when socio‑economic factors are considered - pointing to path‑dependence, not coordinated planning.

Design quirks, first‑come, first‑served calls and complex applications favour municipalities with professionalised grant teams. Without targeted rural (‘Länder’) specific windows and simplified access, DAS risks reinforcing a capacity trap rather than closing Germany’s resilience gap.

Africa's next generation is done waiting. The Pan-African Youth Adaptation Forum produced a seven-priority communiqué, reading less like policy and more like manifesto. Their call for direct funding of youth-led initiatives represents a challenge to the traditional facilitation of climate finance.

Their most reformist demand may be most practical: embedding youth participation "at every development stage" of adaptation plans. Traditional governance treats participation as consultation - a box to tick rather than power to share. African youth propose genuine co-design, where communities shape adaptation plans from conception to implementation.

Whether these demands translate into change depends on political will beyond African capitals. International climate finance remains overwhelmingly controlled by institutions in the Global North, creating structural barriers to the "locally-led adaptation" such a policy document is calling for.

The Meeting of ASEAN Senior Officials on Forestry revealed both ambition and anxiety about Southeast Asia's trajectory on climate resilience. Laos positioned forest landscape restoration as central to climate adaptation, recognising traditional sectoral approaches being inadequate for systemic challenges.

The meeting's Nature-based Solutions Toolkit reflects growing sophistication about forest-climate linkages. Yet these documents emerge against accelerating regional deforestation. Laos's emphasis on community-based management represents pragmatic acknowledgment that top-down conservation has failed. Forests survive where communities have incentives to protect them.

The most transformative developments often receive the least attention. Humanitarian OpenStreetMap's global initiative represents quiet revolution in how communities address climate vulnerability, mapping areas home to 1 billion people.

In Nakuru, Kenya, collaborative efforts contributed 1.4 million building footprints, creating brand new localised flood risk tools. The approach scales through community training programs building local capacity rather than dependence on external stakeholders.

Most importantly, open mapping democratises the generation of climate knowledge. Communities no longer wait for external experts - they map vulnerability themselves, on their terms. When communities can see themselves on the map, they can shape their own future.

This represents a promising trend in adaptation: the shift from consultation to co-production. Rather than adapting to adaptation, communities are adapting adaptation to themselves.

Know someone interested in adapting to a warmer world? Share Liveable with someone who should be in the know.

Or copy and paste this link to share with others: https://research.liveable.world/subscribe